Table 1. Sicklepod control 2 WAT at Brooksville and Newton, MS.a,b,c
Selective
herbicide
Rate Nonselective herbicides
None Glyphosate Paraquat Glufosinate
  lb ai/A ----------%----------
  Brooksville
Fluometuron 1.5 65 73- 74 86
Diuron 1.5 80 84 89 92
Cyanazine 1.8 57 76 83 80
MSMA 2.0 64 63- 61- 51-
Lactofen 0.2 54 66- 76 76
None -- 0 66 47 62
  Newton
Fluometuron 1.5 82 84- 89 86-
Diuron 1.5 83 88 88 88
Cyanazine 1.8 89 76- 88 92
MSMA 2.0 80 83- 83- 85-
Lactofen 0.2 66 86 87 83-
None -- 0 88 81 82
LSD (0.05) -- -----------------------10-----------------------
aData pooled over 1992 and 1993.
bNonselective herbicides: glyphosate, paraquat, and glufosinate rates were 0.5, 0.47, and 0.75 lb ai/A, respectively, and were applied at planting.
cA negative sign denotes an antagonistic response; a positive sign denotes a synergistic response.



Table 2. Sicklepod control 4 WAT At Brooksville and Newton, MS in 1992 and 1993.a,b
Nonselective
herbicide
Selective
herbicide
Rate Brooksville Newton
1992 1993 1992 1993
    lb ai/A ----------%----------
Glyphosate Fluometuron 1.5 50- 36- 85 60-
Diuron 1.5 30- 73- 64- 79
Cyanazine 1.8 87 80 63 69
MSMA 2.0 40- 48- 41- 30-
Lactofen 0.2 58- 50- 38 50
None -- 87 48 33 53
Paraquat Fluometuron 1.5 60- 70+ 83 69
Diuron 1.5 92 83 88 76
Cyanazine 1.8 83 70 73 66
MSMA 2.0 67- 41- 40- 38-
Lactofen 0.2 87+ 50- 55 60+
None -- 45 28 51 28
Glufosinate Fluometuron 1.5 88 66 83 61-
Diuron 1.5 92 58- 86 81
Cyanazine 1.8 80 70 69 79
MSMA 2.0 30- 18- 35- 40-
Lactofen 0.2 60- 50- 46 50
None -- 78 33 36 60
None Fluometuron 1.5 60 33 58 33
Diuron 1.5 77 75 73 75
Cyanazine 1.8 50 53 30 53
MSMA 2.0 70 50 38 50
Lactofen 0.2 26 50 8 50
None -- 0 0 0 0
LSD (0.05)     -----13----- -----20-----
aNonselective herbicides: glyphosate, paraquat, and glufosinate rates were 0.5, 0.47, and 0.75 lb ai/A, respectively, and were applied at planting.
bA negative sign denotes an antagonistic response; a positive sign denotes a synergistic response.



Table 3. Pitted morningglory control 2 WAT at Brooksville, MS.a,b
Selective
herbicide
Rate Nonselective herbicides
None Glyphosate Paraquat Glufosinate
  lb ai/A ----------%----------
Fluometuron 1.5 80 77- 92 85-
Diuron 1.5 77 84- 90 90
Cyanazine 1.8 87 89- 90 92
MSMA 2.0 76 71- 89 91
Lactofen 0.2 71 76- 86 71-
None -- 0 91 63 87
LSD (0.05)   ---------------8---------------
aNonselective herbicides: glyphosate, paraquat, and glufosinate rates were 0.5, 0.47, and 0.75 lb ai/A, respectively, and were applied at planting.
bA negative sign denotes an antagonistic response; a positive sign denotes a synergistic response.



Table 4. Pitted morningglory control 4 WAT at Brooksville, MS in 1992 and 1993.a,b
Selective
herbicide
Rate Nonselective herbicides
None Glyphosate Paraquat Glufosinate
  lb ai/A ----------%----------
1992
Fluometuron 1.5 0 48 48- 55
Diuron 1.5 43 40- 48- 73
Cyanazine 1.8 57 53- 48- 58-
MSMA 2.0 63 50- 52- 45-
Lactofen 0.2 53 48- 50- 55-
None -- 0 50 63 53
1993
Fluometuron 1.7 29 60 33 49+
Diuron 1.7 55 74 53 39-
Cyanazine 2.0 48 74 48 65
MSMA 2.3 28 48- 4 60+
Lactofen 0.225 55 53- 68 55
None -- 0 33 15 9
LSD (0.05)   ----------13----------
aNonselective herbicides: glyphosate, paraquat, and glufosinate rates were 0.5, 0.47, and 0.75 lb ai/A, respectively, and were applied at planting.
bA negative sign denotes an antagonistic response; a positive sign denotes a synergistic response.



Table 5. Cotton injury 2 WAT at Newton, MS for 1992 and 1993.a
Selective
herbicide
Rate 1992 1993
  lb ai/A -------%-------
Fluometuron 1.5 4 4
Diuron 1.5 10 7
Cyanazine 1.8 11 13
MSMA 2.0 8 4
Lactofen 0.2 23 1
None -- 3 1
LSD (0.05) ----------6----------
aData pooled over non-selective herbicides.


Table 6. Cotton injury 4 WAT at Brooksville, MS.a
Selective
herbicide
Rate Nonselective herbicides
None Glyphosate Paraquat Glufosinate
  lb ai/A ----------%----------
Fluometuron 1.5 9 1 1 2
Diuron 1.5 3 1 0 1
Cyanazine 1.8 6 4 2 1
MSMA 2.0 2 0 2 1
Lactofen 0.2 8 5 4 5
None -- 0 1 4 0
LSD (0.05)   ----------4----------
aNonselective herbicides: glyphosate, paraquat, and glufosinate rates were 0.5, 0.47, and 0.75 lb ai/A, respectively, and were applied at planting.