|

Form-Fill-Seal
Machine for Mass Rearing Noctuid Insects
P. Glynn Tillman
Research
Enomologist, USDA-ARSBiological Control and Mass Rearing Research UnitMississippi
State University
Gerald McKibben
Supervisory Research Entomologist, USDA-ARSMississippi
State University
Stan Malone
Maintenance Supervisor,
USDA-ARSMississippi
State University
Dan Harsh
Engineering Technician,
USDA-ARSMississippi
State University
Published by the Office of Agricultural Communications, Division
of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State
University. Edited by Keith H. Remy, Senior Publications Editor. Cover
and illustrations by George Taylor, Chief Illustrator and Graphic Artist.
Abstract
The
egg-implanting operation for noctuid moths is performed with an in-line
form-fill-seal machine, which consists of a heating unit, tray-forming
press, diet-dispensing head with a diet-dispensing pump, cooling tunnel,
egg and corncob grits dispenser, tray-sealing press, and a guillotine.
The process includes forming the rearing trays, filling the trays with
diet, cooling the diet, dispensing eggs mixed in sterile corncob grits
on top of the diet, sealing the trays, then cutting the trays for storage
and shipping. Each of these processes is discussed in detail separately.
Introduction
For
many years, farmers have relied mainly on insecticides for the control
of noctuid pests such as the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens
F.; the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie; and the beet armyworm,
Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). Problems such as insecticide resistance
and environmental contamination may occur with the singular use of insecticides
for control of pest insects. Since natural enemies can help regulate pest
populations, incorporating biological control as a component of an integrated
pest management program can reduce insecticide usage. Production of natural
enemies for field-release requires that the technology for mass rearing
the hosts for the natural enemies be established. With these goals in
mind, an in-line form-fill-seal machine was modified to mechanize production
of the tobacco budworm, the corn earworm, and the beet armyworm.
In
1971, an Anderson Formseal machine Model 655-BBS-9 was purchased from
Anderson Brothers Manufacturing Company in Rockford, Illinois, by the
Southern Grains Insects Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS in Tifton, Georgia.
This machine had a heating unit, forming press, sealing press, and trimming
press. A guillotine was substituted for the trimming press. Diet-filling
and egg-infesting stations were designed, built, and synchronized to make
a continuous automated process (Sparks and Harrell, 1976). The diet-filling
machine poured diet into each of the 32 cells of a rearing tray via tubes
(a single tube poured diet into a single cell). An egg-filler then dropped
eggs into egg channels, which connected to the diet cells. When the eggs
hatched, the larvae would crawl via the egg channels into the diet cells
to feed. Eggs were not placed directly onto the diet because hot diet
caused egg mortality. This form-fill-seal machine with the diet-filling
machine and egg-filler was used to rear more than 6 million corn earworm
pupae from March 1972 to February 1974.
In
1985, this machine was donated to the GAST Rearing Facility, USDA, ARS,
at Mississippi State, Mississippi, by the Tifton laboratory. Modifications
were made to increase the efficiency of the production process. A cooling
tunnel was added to cool the diet to make it possible to place eggs directly
onto the diet. New molds were made for the tray-forming press and tray-sealing
press. The new molds eliminated the egg channels, which were no longer
necessary. A diet-dispensing head with a pump and an egg and corncob grits
dispenser were designed to replace the less efficient diet-filling machine
and egg-filler previously used. A modified Mylar lidding (Davis et al.,
1990; Davis, 1996) was substituted for Tyvek as lidding because the new
Mylar is more permeable to air. Also, a flash sterilizer was added to
the system to sterilize the diet.
The
total operation for rearing noctuids in multicellular trays is performed
with the in-line form-fill-seal machine (FFSM), which is powered electrically
and pneumatically. From front to rear, the parts of the FFSM consist of
a heating unit, tray-forming press, diet-dispensing head with a diet-dispensing
pump, cooling tunnel, egg and corncob grits dispenser, tray-sealing press,
and a guillotine (Figure
1). The process includes
forming the rearing trays, filling the trays with diet, cooling the diet,
dispensing eggs on top of the diet, sealing the trays, and then trimming
the trays for storage and shipping.
Egg Implanting Operation
Tray-forming
Process
The
rearing trays are made from roll stock, polyvinyl chloride plastic 15
cm wide with 15.0-mil gauge (American Mirrex Corp., Newcastle, Delaware),
which is held on a rod at the front of the FFSM (Figure
1). The plastic is
preheated (to about 150° C) as it passes through the heating unit.
Then the plastic moves over the tray-forming press where air pressure
(100 ± 10 psi) forces the material into a 32-celled mold (Figure
2) forming the tray, which immediately cools.
The
resulting 32-celled tray is 14.6 cm wide by 55.1 cm long by 1.8 cm deep;
each cell is 3 cm in diameter and 1.8 cm deep with a rounded bottom 1.5
cm in radius. Trays are formed sequentially in a continuous ribbon and
moved intermittently along the processing line by the FFSM.
Diet-filling
Process
The
agar soybean flour-wheat germ diet (King and Hartley, 1985) is mixed and
then sterilized in a flash sterilizer (Cherry-Burrell Corp., Louisville,
Kentucky). The diet (41-43°C) is pumped continuously from the flash
sterilizer to a semiliquid diet tube (Eckford Dairy Supply, Starkville,
Mississippi), which is 5.1 cm in diameter and 76.2 cm in length (Figure
3). The diet is then
pumped by the diet-dispensing pump (Filling Unit 2971-1, FSV-260-1; National
Instrument Co., Baltimore, Maryland) (Figure
3) into the diet-dispensing head (Figure
2).
Diet
is forced through a hole in the diet-dispensing head to fill a single
cell of the rearing tray with about 7 ml of diet. Since the diet head
has 32 holes, a 32-celled tray can be filled at one time. A hole in the
diet head is 2 mm in diameter, large enough to allow diet to pass through,
but small enough to keep diet from dripping from the head once the cells
are filled with diet.
Diet-cooling
Process
After
the tray is filled with diet, it passes through a cooling tunnel (Griffin
1979a) which is about 1.3 m long (Figure
4). A single unit air
conditioner releases cold (0-2°C) air into the tunnel. This cold
air cools and solidifies the diet.
Egg-dispensing
Process
The
procedures used for adult handling, egg production, and egg collection
for noctuid moths have been described in detail by Jenkins et al. (1995).
Once fresh eggs are obtained, 20 ml of eggs are mixed with 1,020 g of
corncob grits (Anderson Cob Grit Company, Maumee, Ohio). The corncob grits
is a 1:1 mixture of 20/40 mesh:40/60 mesh. Eggs with corn cob grits are
poured into the egg and corncob grits dispenser (Figure
4), which meters and
dispenses ~ 0.65 g of egg and corncob grits mixture onto the diet.
The
egg and corncob grits dispenser is an automated version of the hand inoculator
for dispensing lepidopterous larvae developed by Davis and Oswalt (1979).
The egg and corncob grits dispenser has 32 holes (1.4 cm in diameter),
one hole per tray cell, and releases 2-6 eggs per cell. To reduce static
electricity, tensile is placed underneath the rearing trays when the eggs
are being dropped onto the diet. A positive air flow from the HEPA filter
system (Micro Air Media Air Cleaners, Jackson, Mississippi) moves clean
air across the trays after eggs are dispensed onto the diet to reduce
contamination of the diet in open trays.
Tray-sealing
Process
The
rearing trays are covered and sealed with Mylar (Oliver Products, Grand
Rapids, Michigan; 200-gauge lidding cut 15 cm wide; contains 1.6-2.4 kg
heat seal glue per 100 m2 in dot patterns; processed with 50
perforations per 6.45 cm2). A sponge, wetted with 0.004% Coverage
Plus disinfectant (Calgan Vestal Laboratories, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri),
wipes the Mylar before covering the tray to reduce static electricity.
The tray-sealing press consists of a heating unit on top and a 32-celled
mold to hold the rearing tray. The heating unit seals (130° C) the
Mylar lid onto the tray when pressed down on the mold.
Tray-trimming
process
A
guillotine cuts the trays into sections of two trays each. Each section
of trays is shaken by hand to spread the egg and corncob grits mixture
evenly over the diet. The sections are then stacked in sanitized rackveyors
(Griffin, 1979b).
Production
Efficiency
The
described process produces 13 trays/min resulting in around 800 larvae/minute
or 49,000 larvae/hour. Material cost, excluding colony maintenance costs
and labor costs, is $2.25 to $2.40 per tray. More detailed information
concerning the various operations of this machine can be obtained by request.
Machine vs Hand
Methods
for pupal production
To
determine the efficiency of the form-fill-seal machine in producing pupae,
a comparison was made between this machine and a hand-planting method
of implanting eggs onto the diet. For the hand-planting method, eggs were
transferred individually and gently onto the diet in a tray. Data on implanting
times, number of eggs per cell, percentage of cells with eggs and first
instars, percentage egg hatch, percentage of cells with pupae, and pupal
weights were collected for 8 trays (32 cells per tray; 256 cells total)
of diet for each method. Even though mean pupal weights were higher when
eggs were hand planted onto diet versus implanted by the egg/corn cob
grits dispenser on the FFSM, production of pupae on a tray was much lower
for the hand method in comparison to the machine method for implanting
eggs (Table 1). Thus, in terms of pupal production, the FFSM method for
implanting eggs was much more efficient than the hand method.
Acknowledgments
The
egg-implanting operation using the form-fill-seal machine is a cooperative
effort with all employees at the Biological Control and Mass Rearing Research
Unit at Mississippi State University. We thank George Taylor for producing
the illustrations of the machine and Jim Lytle for the photograph of the
machine. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement
or a recommendation for its use by USDA or by Mississippi State University.
Literature
Cited
Davis, F.M. 1996. Improved
technologies for rearing lepidopterous pests for plant
resistance research. In Proc. of the International
Symposium on Insect Resistant Maize:
Recent Advances and Utilization of
Resistance. Mexico, D. F., CIMMYT. In Press.
Davis, F.M., and T.G.
Oswalt. 1979. Hand inoculator for dispensing lepidopterous
larvae. USDA-ARS-AAT-S-9.
Davis, F. M., S. Malone,
T.G. Oswalt, and W.C. Jordan. 1990. Medium-sized
lepidopterous rearing system using
multicellular rearing trays. J. Econ. Entomol.
83: 1535-1540.
Griffin, J.G. 1979a.
Equipment for cooling larval diet in a boll weevil mass-
rearing operation. U. S. Sci. Educ.
Adm., Adv. Agric. Technol., South. Ser.
No. 1. 3 pp.
Griffin, J.G. 1979b.
"Rackveyor" for use in mass rearing boll weevils. U. S. Sci. Educ.
Adm., Adv. Agric. Technol., South. Ser.
No. 4. 3 pp.
King, E.G., and G.G.
Hartley. 1985. Heliothis virescens, Pp. 323-328. In P. Singh and
R. F. Moore (eds), The handbook of
insect rearing, Vol. II. Elsevier, NY.
Jenkins, J.N., J.C.
McCarty, and M.S. Moghal. 1995. Rearing tobacco budworm and
bollworm for host plant resistance
research. Mississippi State University. MAFES
Tech Bull. 208. 8 pp.Sparks,
A.N., and E.A. Harrell. 1976. Corn earworm rearing mechanization. UDSA,
ARS Tech. Bull. No. 1554. 11 pp.
Table 1. Comparison of pupal production of Heliothis virescens
between the form-
fill-seal machine and the hand method of implanting eggs.
|
|
|
|
Form-fill-seal
machine |
Hand |
|
|
| Mean egg implanting
time (min) |
0.08
a |
5.25
b |
| Mean number
of eggs per cell |
5.08
a |
1.00
b |
| Mean percentage
of cells with eggs |
100.00
a |
100.00
a |
| Mean percentage
egg hatch |
73.90
b |
26.20
b |
| Mean percentage
of cells with first instars |
97.40
a |
26.20
b |
| Mean percentage
of cells with pupae |
81.30
a |
25.10
b |
| Mean pupal
weight (mg) |
243.50
a |
322.90
b |
|
|
| Means
followed by the same letter in a row are not significantly different
(P > 0.05; t-test) |
Copyright
by Mississippi State University. All rights reserved.
This document may be copied and distributed for nonprofit educational
purposes provided that credit is given to the Mississippi State University
Extension Service.
|