Minimizing Aflatoxin in
Corn
Printable PDF version (2 pages)
Aflatoxin is a
naturally occurring toxic chemical by-product from the growth of the
fungus Aspergillus flavus on corn and other crops such as peanuts
and cottonseed. Grain containing aflatoxin is toxic to animals, especially
young animals and poultry; therefore, facilities that handle grain routinely
test loads before accepting delivery.
Aflatoxin problems
are more likely in Mississippi than in the Corn Belt, because the state's
hot, humid climate is ideal for fungal growth. Also, little hybrid resistance
exists and few if any decontamination methods have proven successful
and been granted federal approval.
Stressful Conditions
The Midsouth's
climatic conditions dictate that aflatoxin potential will continue to
threaten corn producers until control measures are identified. Aflatoxin
problems have historically developed during years with severe high-temperature
stress, particularly when coupled with water deficiency and insect ear
and stalk damage. In 1977 and 1998, Mississippi had severe problems
with aflatoxin-contaminated corn.
You can minimize
the likelihood of developing a problem by using sound agronomic practices,
properly storing and drying grain, maintaining grain quality, and sanitizing
grain-handling equipment.
Aflatoxin can infect
corn by airborne spores in the field during grain filling or during
storage and handling. Kernel infection may occur through the silk, cob,
or direct contact. Fungus spores overwinter on plant residue on the
soil. However, management practices intending to reduce the inoculum
level have little impact on aflatoxin development in subsequent years,
because the fungus is abundant in the Midsouth nearly every year.
Management Practices
Aflatoxin
develops in the field when corn is exposed to severe environmental conditions
known to stress kernel development and promote fungal infection within
the ear. Management practices that improve plant health strongly discourage
aflatoxin development.
Timely planting,
adequate fertility, good weed and insect control, supplemental irrigation,
suitable plant population, and hybrid selection should help reduce aflatoxin
potential. Although hybrid evaluations conducted in Mississippi in 1998
indicated little aflatoxin resistance in commercially available hybrids,
hybrids that perform well in drought conditions generally have lower
aflatoxin concentration than hybrids that yield poorly in drought conditions.
Harvest Timing
Producers
may reduce the likelihood of aflatoxin buildup in the field by harvesting
corn before it reaches the industry standard of 15.5 percent moisture.This
system reduces duration when ears may be exposed to unfavorable drying
conditions that promote aflatoxin development in the field. Corn reaches
physiological maturity at about 30 percent moisture and can be harvested
any time thereafter. Mississippi research indicates corn will normally
lose around 0.6 percent moisture per day during the dry-down period.
This rate is not influenced much by hybrid maturity. Thus, you can reduce
field exposure by at least 1 to 2 1/2 weeks by harvesting corn at 20
to 25 percent moisture, compared to letting the corn dry in the field
to 15 percent moisture.
The disadvantage
of early harvest is that wet, warm grain is an ideal environment for
rapid aflatoxin escalation if it is not handled properly. Dry your high-moisture
grain (16-30 percent) to below 15 percent moisture within 24 hours after
harvest or immediately haul the grain to an elevator (that will dry
the grain).
Storage
Do not store
grain in trucks, combines, bins, or any nonaerated site for more than
4 to 6 hours. These conditions quickly escalate aflatoxin levels and
deteriorate grain quality, because fungal growth and grain respiration
will rise quickly in high-moisture grain, particularly with normal Mississippi
August and early September air temperatures.
Conversely, aflatoxin
approaches dormant levels when grain moisture drops to about 12 percent,
especially when air temperatures decline to around 55¡F. If you plan
to dry the grain yourself, do not harvest more corn than you can dry
within these constraints.
Aflatoxin problems
often develop in grain bins being used to dry corn. You must minimize
grain depth (commonly 3-6 feet deep) to quickly dry high-moisture corn
using in-bin drying system. Stirring devices may assist drying but cannot
overcome aeration problems that limit the drying rate in deep-layered
grain. Other drying systems, such as continuous flow and portable batch
driers, normally dry grain within these constraints, if harvest capacity
does not exceed volume of the drying system.
Harvest and Handling Practices
You may improve
grain quality by altering harvest and handling procedures. Fungi readily
invade kernels with cracked or damaged seed coats. If you suspect a
problem, keep obviously stressed, stunted, or damaged areas and field
edges from healthy corn.
Increasing fan
speed, opening sieves, and reducing ground speed help enhance grain
quality collected by a combine. Postharvest screen cleaners and gravity
separators help reduce moderate aflatoxin levels (50 to 100 ppb) below
the FDA standard (20 ppb).
Daily clean out
corn and debris left in combines, trucks, pits, grain carts, and augers;
clean bins before use because these are potential contamination sources.
Spores from fungi on infected grain may readily disperse during handling,
contaminating subsequent grain. A chlorine cleaning solution (3/4 cup
bleach/gallon of water) kills fungal growth on handling facilities.
Detection
Methods historically
used for aflatoxin detection range from visual observations to complex
lab analyses. A "black light" test uses long-wave ultraviolet
light to illuminate a bright yellow-green fluorescence indicative of
a fungal metabolism product that often preludes aflatoxin. This product
is called Kojic acid and should not be confused with aflatoxin. The
"black light" test has limited use; use only as a preliminary
test to a more accurate chemical analysis.
Elevators or grain
markets should use chemical analyses to determine aflatoxin content.
You may also submit samples for analysis to the State Chemical Lab or
buy an aflatoxin test kit from chemical supply companies.
Sampling and Testing
Substantial
aflatoxin testing variability is common because few kernels are normally
contaminated with aflatoxin (less than 0.1 percent), but concentration
in individual kernels is often very high.
You may improve
sampling by increasing the sample size and using proper sampling techniques.
Chemical extraction of aflatoxin requires grinding the grain sample.
Testers should
grind the original sample before a subsample is removed. This improves
distribution of contaminated particles to the subsample. Testers may
also grind particles finer, increase the size of the subsample, and
increase number of analyses per sample to reduce variability. The latter
two recommendations, however, will increase the time and expense involved
with the analytical procedure and may be impractical in some situations.
Action Levels
The United
States Food and Drug Administration action levels for corn contaminated
with aflatoxin establish guidelines for specific uses. Research indicates
that aflatoxin-contaminated corn within these action levels will not
injure the health of specific animals listed or humans consuming foods
derived from these animals.
| FDA
action levels for aflatoxin-contaminated corn include the following: |
| Maximum
level |
Use |
| 20
ppb: |
Human
food, feed for immature animals (including poultry) or dairy
animals, or unknown destination |
| 100
ppb: |
Feed
for breeding cattle, breeding swine, or poultry |
| 200
ppb: |
Feed
for finishing swine of greater than 100 pounds |
| 300
ppb: |
Feed
for finishing beef cattle |
By Dr. Erick
Larson, Extension Corn Specialist
Mississippi State University
does not discriminate on the basis or race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, age, disability, or veteran status.
Information
Sheet 1563
Extension Service of Mississippi State University, cooperating with
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Published in furtherance of Acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914.
Ronald A. Brown, Director