1998 Soybean Variety Trials

Reaction to Pests and Herbicides

Table 74. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Early Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides. 1

Variety





Brand





Disease reaction2,3


Herbicide
reaction7





Virus
SMU/BPMV


Phytophthora
root rot4

Cyst
nematode5

Frogeye
leafspot4


Stem
canker4,6

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

AP 4880

Agripro

R

M

--

--

R

S

S

MS

R

1.1

T

A4341

Asgrow

R

--

--

--

--

S

S

MR

R

1.1

T

A4604

Asgrow

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(R)

1.5

T

DK4860

Delta King

R

--

--

--

S

S

MS

S

R-S (S)

3.3

--

X9240RR

Delta King

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R-S (S)

3.3

T

DP3478

Deltapine

R

--

--

--

R

S

S

S

R

1.0

T

HBK 4600

Hornbeck

MR

--

R

--

--

MR

R

S

R-VS(VS)

4.3

T

HBK 4755

Hornbeck

R

M

M

--

S

--

--

S

R

1.3

T

HY 4540

HyPerformer

R

M

--

--

S

R

R

S

R-S (S)

3.7

T

S46-44

NK

R

--

--

--

S

MR

R

S

R

1.1

T

TS4792

Terra

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.0

T

TV4479

Terral

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

MS

R-S (M)

3.1

T

TV4664

Terral

R

R

--

--

--

MR

MR

S

R-S (R)

1.7

T

Stressland

Public

R

R

--

--

S

S

S

I

R

1.1

--

TN4-86

Public

I

--

--

S

S

R

R

S

R

1.1

T

TN4-94

Public

MR

--

--

--

--

MR

MR

S

R-S (R)

1.9

T

1All are released varieties.
2R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
3The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
4Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
5Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
6"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4;
R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety s predominant reaction. For example,
(R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
7Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T=tolerant, S=susceptible.





Table 75. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Late Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety





Brand





Disease reaction1,2


Herbicide
reaction6





Virus
SMU/BPMV


Phytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot3


Stem
canker3,5

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

A4922

Asgrow

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

MS

R-S (R)

2.6

T

DP3478

Deltapine

--

--

--

--

R

S

S

S

R

1.0

T

DPX 8S49 (E)7

Deltapine

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.2

T

Dixie 478

Dixie

R

--

--

--

--

S

S

MS

R

2.1

--

DG3495

Dyna-Gro

I

--

--

--

R

S

S

S

R

1.2

T

FFR 495

Elite

R

--

4

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

T

Genesis 9482

Genesis

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

--

T

HBK 49

Hornbeck

MR

--

--

R

--

S

S

I

R

1.0

T

HBK 4890

Hornbeck

R

M

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.2

T

HBK 5149

Hornbeck

R

R

R

--

--

--

--

I

R

1.1

T

HBK X9749 (E) 7

Hornbeck

R

--

--

--

--

MR

MS

R

R

1.8

T

9482

Pioneer

R

M

--

--

--

S

MS

I

R-S (R)

1.6

T

9492

Pioneer

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R-S (M)

2.8

T

9511

Pioneer

R

--

--

--

--

S

S

S

R

1.0

T

RVS 490

Riverside

I

M

--

--

R

S

S

I

R

1.2

T

TV4770

Terral

MR

--

--

--

--

R

MR

S

R

1.1

T

TV 4975

Terral

R

R

--

--

--

S

S

MR

R

1.0

--

KS 4895

Public

R

S

--

--

S

MS

MS

MR

R

1.0

T

Manokin

Public

MR

--

--

--

R

R

S

MR

R

1.2

T

1R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4; R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, (R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T=tolerant, S=susceptible.
7(E) = Experimental.





Table 76. Reaction of Maturity Group V Early Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety





Brand





Disease reaction1,2


Herbicide
reaction6





Virus
SMU/BPMV


Phytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot3


Stem
canker3,5

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

AP 527STS

Agripro

R

--

--

--

--

MS

MS

R

R

1.3

--

A5547

Asgrow

R

M

--

--

R

MR

R

MR

R-S (R)

1.9

T

A5704

Asgrow

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S (R)

2.1

T

55

Buckshot

MR

--

--

S

S

MR

MR

I

MR

1.5

T

DG500A (E)7

DEKALB

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

MS

4.0

T

DG500B (E)7

DEKALB

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.3

T

Delta King 5850

Delta King

MR

--

--

S

R

MR

MR

MR

R-S (R)

1.7

T

DK X9450RR

Delta King

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.1

T

DP 3519S

Deltapine

R

M

--

--

M

R

MR

R

R-S (R)

1.8

T

DP 5354

Deltapine

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.7

T

DPX 8S56 (E)7

Deltapine

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.2

T

Genesis 9511

Genesis

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.8

--

H5050

Hartz

MR

--

--

--

--

MS

MS

MR

R

1.1

T

HY 574

HyPerformer

MR

R

--

R

R

MR

S

MS

R-S (R)

1.5

T

S57-11

NK

R

R

--

--

R

R

R

I

R

1.2

T

X9851 (E)7

NK

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.8

T

X9855 (E)7

NK

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S (R)

1.8

T

9511

Pioneer

--

--

--

--

--

S

S

S

R

1.0

T

95B33

Pioneer

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R-S

1.9

--

RVS 77

Riverside

MR

--

--

--

--

S

S

I

R

1.1

T

RVS 520

Riverside

MS

--

R

--

--

S

MS

R

R

1.0

T

RVS 529I

Riverside

MR

M

--

--

R

S

MS

MS

R

1.0

T

RVS 549

Riverside

MR

R

--

R

R

S

S

MS

MS

1.7

T

Robin-5

Riverside

MR

R

--

--

R

R

S

I

R-S

2.5

T

TV5495

Terral

--

--

--

--

--

R

S

S

R

1.0

T

Delsoy 5500

Public

R

M

--

--

M

MS

MR

MR

R-S (R)

1.2

T-S

Essex

Public

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (S)

2.3

--

Essex RSV1 (E)7

Public

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R-S (S)

2.2

--

Hutcheson

Public

--

--

--

M

--

S

S

R

R

1.0

T

TN5-95

Public

MR

M

--

--

M

R

MR

MS

R-S (R)

1.5

T

V89-805 (E)7

Public

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.2

T

V90-1012 (E)

Public

R

--

R

--

--

S

S

I

R

1.3

--

1R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4;
R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example,
(R)-VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T=tolerant, S=susceptible.
7 (E) = Experimental.





Table 77. Reaction of Maturity Group V Late Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety





Brand





Disease reaction1,2


Herbicide
reaction6






Virus
SMU/BPMV



Phytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot3


Stem
canker3,5

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

A5843

Asgrow

R

M

--

--

R

R

R

R

R

1.0

T

A5848

Asgrow

MR

M

--

--

M

MR

R

R

R

1.1

T

A5944

Asgrow

R

M

--

--

R

S

S

I

R

1.0

T

A5959

Asgrow

MR

R

--

--

--

--

--

MS

R-S (R)

1.6

T

CX570c

DEKALB

R

R

--

--

--

--

--

I

R-S

2.4

T

DG758

DEKALB

MR

R

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.5

T

DG759

DEKALB

--

M

--

--

--

--

--

I

R-S (S)

2.4

T

DG858 (E)7

DEKALB

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S

2.3

T

Delta King 5995

Delta King

R

M

--

--

S

--

--

I

R-S (R)

2.0

T

DP 3588

Deltapine

R

R

--

M

R

R

S

R

R

1.1

T

DPX 8S59 (E)7

Deltapine

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.1

--

DG3576

Dyna-Gro

R

M

--

--

M

MS

S

I

R

1.3

T

FFR 597

Elite

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.1

T

HBK 5770

Hornbeck

R

R

--

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.0

T

HBK 5990

Hornbeck

R

M

--

--

R

--

--

MR

R

1.1

--

HBK X571-98 (E)7

Hornbeck

I

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.2

T

S51-00

NK

MR

S

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.8

T

S59-60

NK

R

S

--

M

S

R

R

S

R

1.2

T

9594

Pioneer

MR

M

--

--

R

S

S

MS

R-S

2.0

T

TV5893

Terral

R

M

--

--

R

R

S

S

R

1.0

T

TV5926

Terral

I

R

--

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.0

T

DT95-15091 (E)7

Public

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R-S

2.2

T

DT95-15550 (E)7

Public

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S

1.9

T

DT95-17556 (E)7

Public

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R

1.8

T

Hutcheson

Public

--

--

--

M

--

S

S

R

R

1.0

T

UARK-5798

Public

--

R

--

--

R

--

--

R

MR

1.2

T

Caviness

Public

R

M

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.8

T

UARK-5896

Public

I

M

--

--

--

R

MS

R

R-S

2.3

S

V91-3036 (E)7

Public

I

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.2

--

1R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4;
R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example,
(R)-VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T=tolerant, S=susceptible.
7(E) = Experimental.





Table 78. Reaction of Maturity Group VI Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety





Brand





Disease reaction1,2


Herbicide
reaction6






Virus
SMU/BPMV



Phytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot3


Stem
canker3,5

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

A6297

Asgrow

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (S)

3.5

--

A6711

Asgrow

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

1.6

--

A6785

Asgrow

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S

2.6

--

A6961

Asgrow

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.0

--

BU66

Buckshot

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

2.3

--

BU723

Buckshot

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.0

--

DG762 (E)7

DEKALB

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S(R)

2.1

--

FFR 665

Elite

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (S)

3.0

--

H6200

Hartz

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (S)

2.9

--

HBK 6600

Hornbeck

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.0

--

HBK 6800

Hornbeck

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (S)

2.1

--

S62-62

NK

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.3

--

9594

Pioneer

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

3.5

--

9631

Pioneer

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (S)

3.4

--

9692

Pioneer

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.1

--

RVS678

Riverside

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

1.3

--

BOGGS

SGA

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.2

--

Dillon

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

1.8

--

Lamar

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.0

--

Musen

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.0

--

R92-1258 (E)7

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

1.4

--

SC89-147

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

1.2

--

TN6-90

Public

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

R-S (R)

1.4

--

1R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4;
R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example,
(R)-VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T=tolerant, S=susceptible.
7(E) = Experimental.




Table 79. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Early Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.1

Variety

Brand

Disease reaction2,3

 

Herbicide
reaction8

Virus
SMU/BPMV

Pytophthora
root rot4

Cyst
nematode5

Frogeye
leafspot4

Stem
canker4,6

Sudden
death syndrome7

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

Rating

Score

AP4602RR

Agripro

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.2

2

MR

T

AG4501RR

Asgrow

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MS

MS

1.1

1

R

T

AG4601RR

Asgrow

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(S)

3.5

3

MR

--

AG4602RR

Asgrow

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R-S(M)

1.9

1

R

T

CX 460RR

DEKALB

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.1

3

MR

T

DK4762RR

Delta King

R

--

R-S(S)

--

--

--

--

S

MS-VS(S)

3.4

2

MR

T

FFR 467RR

Elite

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R-S (S)

3.7

4

MS

T

H3090RR

Hartz

R

--

VR

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.3

2

R

T

H4252RR

Hartz

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(R)

1.5

3

MR

T

HBK R4515RR

Hornbeck

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R-VS(S)

3.6

2

MR

T

SF477RR

SF Services

MR

MS

--

--

S

--

--

S

R-VS(S)

3.4

3

MR

T

SG 468RR

Sure Grow

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.0

3

MR

T

TS 466RR

Terra

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.0

1

MR

T

TV4466RR

Terral

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

MS-VS(S)

4.1

5

MS

T

TV4666RR

Terral

MR

MR

--

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(S)

3.3

1

R

--

2467NRR

Willcross

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

4

MS

T

1All are released varieties.
2R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
3The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
4Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
5Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
6"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4; R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, (R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
7Score: Resistant (R) = 0-1; Moderately Resistant (MR) = 2-3; Moderately Susceptible (MS) = 4-5; Susceptible (S) = 6-7; and Very Susceptible (VS) = 8-9. Sudden death syndrome was measured at Dulaney Farms in Clarksdale.
8Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T = tolerant, S = susceptible.




Table 80. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Late Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.1

Variety

Brand

Disease reaction2,3

 

Herbicide
reaction8

Virus
SMU/BPMV

Pytophthora
root rot4

Cyst
nematode5

Frogeye
leafspot4

Stem
canker4,6

Sudden
death syndrome7

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

Rating

Score

AP 4980RR

Agripro

MR

--

M

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.1

4

MS

T

AG4701RR

Asgrow

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

MS

I

3.1

1

R

--

AG4702RR

Asgrow

R

M

--

--

--

--

--

I

I

3.4

2

MR

--

AG4901RR

Asgrow

MR

--

--

--

--

--

-

I

I

2.6

2

MR

--

DK 4965RR8

Delta King

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

T

DP 4750RR

Deltapine

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R

1.5

5

MS

I

DP 4969RR

Deltapine

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

I

R

1.0

1

R

T

3463RR

Dyna-Gro

R

R

--

--

--

--

--

I

R

--

1

R

T

H4994RR

Hartz

R

R

--

--

S

R

R

R

R-S(M)

2.7

2

MR

--

H4998RR

Hartz

I

R

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S(S)

2.8

5

MS

--

HBK R4898RR

Hornbeck

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.1

5

MS

T

9492RR

Pioneer

--

--

R

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1

R

T

94B81RR

Pioneer

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R-S(R)

1.6

1

R

T

SG498RR

Sure Grow

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.2

5

MS

T

1All are released varieties.
2R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
3The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
4Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
5Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
6"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4; R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, (R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
7Score: Resistant (R) = 0-1; Moderately Resistant (MR) = 2-3; Moderately Susceptible (MS) = 4-5; Susceptible (S) = 6-7; and Very Susceptible (VS) = 8-9. Sudden death syndrome was measured at Dulaney Farms in Clarksdale.
8Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T = tolerant, S = susceptible.
9Planted at Clarksdale and Stoneville only.




Table 81. Reaction of Maturity Group V Early Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety

Brand

Disease reaction1,2

 

Herbicide
reaction7

Virus
SMU/BPMV

Pytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot3

Stem
canker3,5

Sudden
death syndrome6

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

Rating

Score

AP543RR

Agripro

R

M

--

--

--

--

--

MS

R-S(R)

1.4

3

MR

T

AG5601RR

Asgrow

--

--

--

--

R

--

--

R

R

1.0

1

R

--

AG5602RR

Asgrow

R

R

R

--

S

--

--

MS

R

1.1

3

MR

--

AG5401RR

Asgrow

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R-S(R)

2.5

2

MR

--

DG531RR(E)8

DEKALB

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S(R)

1.4

4

MS

T

DK5263RR

Delta King

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

MR

1.8

0

R

T

DK5664RR

Delta King

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.1

4

MS

T

DP 5644RR

Deltapine

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S(R)

1.9

4

MS

--

FFR TR517RR

Elite

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

--

4

MS

T

FFR RT557RR

Elite

R

--

S

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

3

MR

T

FFR RT587RR

Elite

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R-S (R)

1.7

4

MS

T

H5013RR

Hartz

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.2

2

MR

T

H5057RR

Hartz

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

1

R

T

H5088RR

Hartz

R

R

--

S

R

R

S

RR

R

1.1

4

MS

S

H5350RR

Hartz

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

I

R-S(R)

1.9

6

S

T

H5545RR

Hartz

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-VS (S)

3.4

2

MR

--

H5855RR

Hartz

R

R

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.8

3

MR

--

HBK R5411RR

Hornbeck

R

M

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S(R)

1.3

3

MR

T

HBK R5404RR

Hornbeck

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S(R)

1.9

7

S

T

HBK R5588RR

Hornbeck

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

2

MR

T

X9856RR (E)8

NK

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S(R)

1.5

4

MS

T

95B41RR

Pioneer

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S

2.4

2

MR

T

SG567RR

Sure-Grow

R

R

--

--

S

--

--

MR

R-S(R)

1.3

4

MS

--

SF567RR

SF Services

R

M

--

--

S

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.3

6

S

--

RVS X08RR (E)8

Terra

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

1

R

I

TS 556RR

Terra

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

4

MS

--

TV5666RR

Terral

R

M

--

--

R

R

MR

R

R-S(R)

1.7

4

MS

--

TV5466RR

Terral

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.2

5

MS

T

2517RR

Willcross

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

4

MS

T

1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4; R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, (R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Score: Resistant (R) = 0-1; Moderately Resistant (MR) = 2-3; Moderately Susceptible (MS) = 4-5; Susceptible (S) = 6-7; and Very Susceptible (VS) = 8-9. Sudden death syndrome was measured at Dulaney Farms in Clarksdale.
7Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T = tolerant, S = susceptible.
8(E) = Experimental.




Table 82. Reaction of Maturity Group V Late Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides.

Variety

Brand

Disease reaction1,2

 

Herbicide
reaction7

Virus
SMU/BPMV

Pytophthora
root rot3

Cyst
nematode4

Frogeye
leafspot4

Stem
canker3,5

Sudden
death syndrome6

R2

R4

R7

R10

R3

R14

Rating

Score

Rating

Score

AP588RR

Agripro

R

M

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

2

MR

--

AG5801RR

Asgrow

I

--

--

--

R

--

--

S

R-S

2.5

7

S

--

AG5901RR

Asgrow

MR

--

--

--

R

--

--

MR

R

1.0

5

MS

--

AG6101RR

Asgrow

I

--

--

--

S

--

--

MR

R

1.1

4

MS

--

CX550RR

DEKALB

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R-S

2.4

2

MR

T

DG858 (E)8

DEKALB

I

--

R

--

--

--

--

I

R-S

2.1

1

R

T

DK 5961RR

Delta King

I

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.3

3

MR

T

DP 5806RR

Deltapine

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(R)

1.4

6

S

--

DP 5960RR

Deltapine

MR

MR

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S (R)

1.7

6

S

--

DP 6200RR

Deltapine

I

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R-S (R)

1.5

3

MR

T

H5181RR

Hartz

MS

--

R

--

--

--

--

MS

R

1.1

5

MS

T

H5889RR

Hartz

MR

R

--

--

S

--

--

MR

R

1.0

1

R

--

H5999RR

Hartz

MR

M (R)

--

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.0

5

MS

--

H6255RR

Hartz

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.0

4

MS

T

HBK R5884RR

Hornbeck

MR

R

--

--

R

--

--

I

R-S

2.3

1

R

T

S51-T1RR

NK

MR

--

M

--

--

--

--

MR

R-S

2.4

5

MS

T

S59-V6RR

NK

MR

M

--

--

S

--

--

MS

R-S

2.5

3

MR

--

X9857RR(E)8

NK

R

--

M

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(R)

1.5

3

MR

T

95B71

Pioneer

I

--

M

--

--

--

--

R

R-S

2.3

2

MR

T

96B01

Pioneer

MR

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R-S(S)

2.7

7

S

T

SG597RR

Sure-Grow

MR

--

--

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.2

5

MS

T

SG617RR

Sure-Grow

R

R

--

--

--

--

--

M

R-S(R)

2.1

7

S

--

RVS X037RR(E)8

Terra

R

--

M

--

--

--

--

MR

R

1.3

3

MR

T

RVS X024RR(E)8

Terra

M

--

R

--

--

--

--

R

R

1.2

1

R

T

TV 5866RR

Terral

MR

M

--

--

--

--

--

S

S

2.9

2

MR

--

0038RR (E)8

UAPX

R

--

R

--

--

--

--

S

R

1.3

4

MS

T

1R = Resistant, M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant.
2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression field tolerance, (due to the use of a low inoculum potential).
3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University.
4Nematode reactions as reported by R. D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas.
5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6 - 5.0; S = 2.0 - 4.5; MS = 1.5 - 1.9; MR = 1.2 - 1.4; R = 1.0 - 1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e., R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, (R) -VS means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibited such a range were mixes or were still segregating.
6Score: Resistant (R) = 0-1; Moderately Resistant (MR) = 2-3; Moderately Susceptible (MS) = 4-5; Susceptible (S) = 6-7; and Very Susceptible (VS) = 8-9. Sudden death syndrome was measured at Dulaney Farms in Clarksdale.
7Reaction to hydroponic screening to metribuzin; T = tolerant, S = susceptible.
8(E) = Experimental.