MAFES Header Return to MSUcares Home Page

Nematode Management Investigations in Mississippi, 1997


Table 41. Effect of Metham Sodium on the yield of Sure Grow 501 cotton in a field infested with the reniform nematode.1
Treatment Rate
per acre2
Application
method
Seed
cotton
Seed
cotton
Yield increase
over control

lb/plotin lb/A lb/A
Metham Sodium 5 gal 10-in band
ahead of planter
15.32 a    2,504.7 a    814.9
Metham Sodium 10 gal 10-in band
ahead of planter
14.66 ab   2,396.4 ab   706.6
Metham Sodium 20 gal 10-in band
ahead of planter
13.72 abc 2,243.8 abc 554.0
Metham Sodium 5 gal 10-in band
in-furrow
12.22 bcd 1,834.3 bcd 145.0
Metham Sodium 7.5 gal 10-in band
in-furrow
11.54 bc   1,887.5 bc   198.5
Metham Sodium 10 gal 10-in band
in-furrow
7.78 d    1,272.5 d     -417.3
Temik 15G 5 lb In-furrow 15.36 a    2,511.6 a    821.8
Di-Syston 8EC 1 lb ai In-furrow 10.40 cd   1,700.3 cd   10.5
Control -- -- 10.34 cd   1,689.8 cd   --

LSD (P=0.05)
3.56 581.51
1Data are means of five replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on 40-inch row spacing.



Table 42. Effect of Telone II on population development of the reniform nematode at Sumner, Mississippi.1
Treatment Rate
per acre 2
Application
method
Reniform / 500 cm3 soil Average3
April June August
Telone II 3 gal Preplant 8,935 b   567 b 4,867 a 4,790 b
Temik 15G 7 lb In-furrow 14,008 a   4,764 a   8,884 a 9,219 a
Gaucho 4 oz ai/cwt Seed treatment 8,755 b 3,064 ab 9,141 a   6,987 ab

LSD (P=0.05)
3,859 2,996 5,063 3,355
1Data are means of five replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on 10-row plots in a modified skip pattern.
3Average reniform nematode population density across all sample dates.



Table 43. Effect of Telone II on plant survival and the height of DPL 33B cotton.
Treatment Rate
per acre
Application
method
Plant height at 29-63 days after planting
29 36 47
Telone II 3 gal Preplant 7.54 13.63 26.06
Temik 15G 7 lb In-furrow 6.44 10.12 20.00
Gaucho 4 oz ai/cwt Seed treatment 7.38 11.68 22.46


Table 43. Continued.

Table 43. Effect of Telone II on plant survival and the height of DPL 33B cotton.
Treatment Rate
per acre
Application
method
Plant height at 29-63 days after planting Plant
stand
50 56 63
Telone II 3 gal PreplantM 31.42 46.16 63.95 44,600
Temik 15G 7 lb In-furrow 20.66 36.96 46.80 26,800
Gaucho 4 oz ai/cwt Seed treatment 26.42 38.88 53.45 51,400



Table 44. Effect of Telone II on the number of nodes produced and first fruiting node on DPL 33B cotton.
Treatment Rate
per acre
Application
method
Nodes per plant at 47-63 days after planting Node of first
fruiting branch
Node of first
retained boll
47 50 56 63
Telone II 3 gal Preplant 9.48 10.52 12.28 15.25 7.7 8.2
Temik 15G 7 lb In-furrow 8.52 9.96 11.60 14.35 8.0 7.3
Gaucho 4 oz ai/cwt Seed treatment 8.48 10.04 11.64 13.80 7.5 7.1



Table 45. Efficacy of selected compounds on free-living turf nematode populations in 1997.
Treatment Rate2 Free-living nematodes / 250 cm3 soil
June August September Average3
Clandosan 1 ton/A   1,880 bc   689 ab 2,408 a      1,659 ab
Sustane 1 lb N/1,000 ft2 2,845 a 1,030 a     1,719 abc   1,865 a
Sustane + Iron 0.5 lb N/1,000 ft2   2,382 ab  682 ab 2,009 ab   1,691 ab
Safe-T Green 18 3 pt/A 2,446 a 418 b 1,551 abc  1,472 abc
Neo-Trol 5 lb/1,000 ft2 1,738 c 586 b 1,371 bc   1,232 bc
Neo-Trol 10 lb/1,000 ft2 2,755 a  637 ab 1,101 bc   1,498 abc
Neo-Trol +
  Neo-Trol
5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
  5 lb/1,000 ft2
1,532 c  695 ab 927 c 1,051 c
Bolster 3 oz/1,000 ft2 2,485 a 560 b 1036 bc 1,360 abc
ACT 6 oz/A   1,880 bc 412 b 830 c 1,041 c
Turf Ease II 6 oz/A 2,845 a 650 b 1,957 ab   1,817 ab
Nemacur 10G 2.3 lb/1,000 ft2 2,414 a 567 b 1,436 abc 1,472 abc
Control -- 2,446 a 335 b 1,423 abc 1,401 abc

LSD (P=0.05)
504 402 1,026 587
1Data are means of four replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on a broadcast application.
3Average nematode population density across all sample dates.



Table 46. Efficacy of selected compounds on total plant-parasitic
nematode populations in turf in 1997.1
Treatment Rate2 Plant-parasitic nematodes / 250 cm3 soil
June August September Average3
Clandosan 1 ton/A 721 a 373 a 565 ab 553 a
Sustane 1 lb N/1,000 ft2 367 bc 309 a 399 ab 358 bc
Sustane + Iron 0.5 lb N/1,000 ft2 438 abc 258 a 367 ab 354 bc
Safe-T Green 18 3 pt/A 406 bc 129 a 328 b 288 cd
Neo-Trol 5 lb/1,000 ft2 399 bc 232 a 219 b 283 cd
Neo-Trol 10 lb/1,000 ft2 496 ab 206 a 843 a 515 ab
Neo-Trol +
  Neo-Trol
5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
  5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
187 c 232 a 238 b 219 cd
Bolster 3 oz/1,000 ft2 341 bc 264 a 161 b 255 cd
ACT 6 oz/A 142 c 97 a 122 b 120 d
Turf Ease II 6 oz/A 373 bc 135 a 251 b 253 cd
Nemacur 10G 2.3 lb/1,000 ft2 270 bc 90 a 77 b 146 d
Control -- 264 bc 206 a 303 b 258 cd

LSD (P=0.05)
306 354 494 186
1Data are means of four replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on a broadcast application.
3Average nematode population density across all sample dates.



Table 47. Efficacy of selected compounds on Ring nematode populations in turf in 1997.1
Treatment Rate2 Ring nematodes / 250 cm3 soil
June August September Average3
Clandosan 1 ton/A 438 a 232 a 425 ab 362 ab
Sustane 1 lb N/1,000 ft2 232 abc 225 a 296 ab 251 abc
Sustane + Iron 0.5 lb N/1,000 ft2 283 abc 161 a 232 b 225 bc
Safe-T Green 18 3 pt/A 232 abc 71 a 232 b 178 cd
Neo-Trol 5 lb/1,000 ft2 232 abc 161 a 180 b 191 cd
Neo-Trol 10 lb/1,000 ft2 335 ab 142 a 702 a 393 a
Neo-Trol +
  Neo-Trol
5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
   5 lb/1,000 ft2
142 bc 161 a 167 b 157 cd
Bolster 3 oz/1,000 ft2 161 bc 187 a 103 b 150 cd
ACT 6 oz/A 64 c 39 a 77 b 60 d
Turf Ease II 6 oz/A 245 abc 90 a 200 b 178 cd
Nemacur 10G 2.3 lb/1,000 ft2 238 abc 45 a 45 b 109 cd
Control -- 225 abc 155 a 155 b 178 cd

LSD (P=0.05)
250 287 424 158
1Data are means of four replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on a broadcast application.
3Average nematode population density across all sample dates.



Table 48. Efficacy of selected compounds on stubby-root nematode populations in turf in 1997.2
Treatment Rate2 Stubby-root nematodes / 250 cm3 soil
June August September Average3
Clandosan 1 ton/A 238 a 129 a 135 a 167 a
Sustane 1 lb N/1,000 ft2 97 bcde 77 a 103 abc 92 bcd
Sustane + Iron 0.5 lb N/1,000 ft2 135 bcd 90 a 122 ab 116 ab
Safe-T Green 18 3 pt/A 142 abc 45 a 90 abc 92 bcd
Neo-Trol 5 lb/1,000 ft2 142 abc 71 a 32 c 82 bcd
Neo-Trol 10 lb/1,000 ft2 109 bcde 58 a 116 abc 94 bc
Neo-Trol +
  Neo-Trol
5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
  5 lb/1,000 ft2
19 e 71 a 71 abc 54 cd
Bolster 3 oz/1,000 ft2 174 ab 77 a 58 abc 103 bc
ACT 6 oz/A 65 cde 52 a 45 bc 54 cd
Turf Ease II 6 oz/A 77 bcde 39 a 32 c 49 cd
Nemacur 10G 2.3 lb/1,000 ft2 45 a 32 c 32 d 71 bcd
Control -- 39 de 45 a 129 ab 71 bcd

LSD (P=0.05)
98 101 89 62
1Data are means of four replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on a broadcast application.
3Average nematode population density across all sample dates.



Table 49. Efficacy of selected compounds on root-knot nematode
populations in turf in 1997.1
Treatment Rate2 Root-knot nematodes / 250 cm3 soil
June August September Average3
Clandosan 1 ton/A 45 ab 13 a 6 bc 21 ab
Sustane 1 lb N/1,000 ft2 39 ab 6 a 0 c 15 abc
Sustane + Iron 0.5 lb N/1,000 ft2 19 ab 6 a 13 abc 13 abc
Safe-T Green 18 3 pt/A 26 ab 0 a 6 bc 11 abc
Neo-Trol 5 lb/1,000 ft2 13 ab 0 a 6 bc 6 bc
Neo-Trol 10 lb/1,000 ft2 52 a 6 a 28 a 29 a
Neo-Trol +
  Neo-Trol
5 lb/1,000 ft2 +
5 lb/1,000 ft2
26 ab 0 a 0 c 9 bc
Bolster 3 oz/1,000 ft2 6 ab 0 a 0 c 2 c
ACT 6 oz/A 13 ab 6 a 0 c 6 bc
Turf Ease II 6 oz/A 52 a 0 a 0 c 17 abc
Nemacur 10G 2.3 lb/1,000 ft2 13 ab 0 a 0 c 4 bc
Control -- 0 b 6 a 19 ab 8 bc

LSD (P=0.05)
48 16 19 19
1Data are means of four replications. Means were compared using the least significant difference test.
2Rates were calculated based on a broadcast application.
3Average nematode population density across all sample dates.


 

A black line that separates the body text from footer information


Mississippi State University logo
Visit: DAFVM || USDA
Search our Site || Need more information about this subject?
Last Modified: Monday, 29-Jul-02 08:11:06
URL: http://msucares.com/pubs/bulletins/b1076t41-49.htm
Mississippi State University is an equal opportunity institution.
Recommendations on this web site do not endorse any commercial products or trade names.