Table 1. Representative soil particle size distribution of major horizons before plot construction.

Depth

Sand

Silt

Clay

Texture

inches

-----------------%-----------------

0-10

10.4

25.7

63.9

clay

10-24

20.1

27.0

52.9

clay

24-53

9.2

34.6

56.2

clay

53-75

13.4

40.1

46.5

silty clay

75-120

63.0

25.3

11.7

sandy loam




Table 2. Representative chemical properties of major horizons before plot construction.

Depth

pH

Organic
Matter

Exchangeable Cations

Base
Sat.

Ca

Mg

K

Na

H+

Total

inches

 

%

---------cmolckg-1

%

0-10

4.7

2.46

14.41

6.97

0.63

0.23

14.23

36.47

60.98

10-24

4.9

0.67

16.65

11.66

0.59

1.07

7.32

37.29

80.37

24-53

6.8

0.27

26.17

18.09

0.52

3.52

2.24

50.54

95.57

53-75

7.7

0.12

14.33

7.17

0.32

1.02

1.56

24.40

93.61

75-120

7.8

0.10

10.82

3.52

0.27

0.29

0.87

15.77

94.50




Table 3. Representative particle size distribution of surface horizons (0 to 6 inches) of constructed subplots January 1981.

Treatment

Sand

Silt

Clay

Texture

 

-----%-----

 

T1

12.2

28.1

59.7

clay

T2

13.7

28.2

58.1

clay

T3

13.3

28.7

58.0

clay

T4

62.4

20.4

17.2

sandy loam

T5

20.3

31.5

48.2

clay

Control

9.1

27.9

63.0

clay




Table 4. Representative chemical properties of surface horizons (0 to 6 inches) of constructed subplots, January 1981, before liming and fertilization.

Treatment

pH

Organic
Matter

Exchangeable Cations

Base
Sat.

Ca

Mg

K

Na

H+

Total

 

 

%

---------------cmolckg-1--------------

%

T1

5.1

1.6

16.17

9.51

0.67

0.50

13.69

40.54

66

T2

5.5

1.7

19.96

8.76

0.63

0.42

12.98

42.75

69

T3

5.9

1.2

22.77

10.43

0.66

0.64

9.81

44.31

78

T4

8.1

0.1

16.74

8.11

0.31

0.49

0.68

26.33

97

T5

5.4

0.6

13.33

11.35

0.62

0.75

9.23

35.28

74

Control

5.5

2.8

17.09

7.23

0.68

0.24

12.25

37.49

67




Table 5. Soil bulk density of the surface horizon (0 to 6 inches) for 3 years after plot construction.

Treatment

Years After Construction

1

2

3

 

----------mg/m3----------

T1

1.10

1.15

1.32

T2

1.20

1.17

1.24

T3

1.15

1.15

1.35

T4

1.29

1.24

1.43

T5

1.23

1.29

1.43

Control

1.13

1.20

1.28




Table 6. Mean soybean yields and statistical relationships for soil-handling treatments, 1981 season.

Treatment

Mean Yields (bu/A)

T1

32.1a

T2

33.8 a

T3

34.8a

T4

38.6a

T5

33.9a

Control

17.5b

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 7. Mean soybean yields of flat and hipped treatments and statistical relationships, 1981 season.

Land Preparation Method

Mean Yields (bu/A)

Flat

33.4 a

Hipped

30.2a

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 8. Mean soybean yields and statistical relationships for soil-handling treatments, 1982 season.

Treatment

Mean Yields (bu/A)

T1

41.2a

T2

39.8a

T3

41.0a

T4

40.2a

T5

43.2a

Control

34.9b

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 9. Mean soybean yields of flat and hipped treatments and statistical relationships, 1982 season.

Land Preparation Method

Mean Yields (bu/A)

Flat

40.8a

Hipped

39.3a

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 10. Mean soybean yields and statistical relationships for soil-handling treatments, 1983 season.

Treatment

Mean Yields (bu/A)

T1

18.1a

T2

17.5a

T3

17.4a

T4

19.9a

T5

18.2a

Control

8.0b

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 11. Mean soybean yields of flat and hipped treatments and statistical relationships, 1983 season.

Land Preparation Method

Mean Yields (bu/A

Flat

16.9a

Hipped

16.1a

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 12. Mean soybean yields for the 3-year study and the statistical relationships.

Treatment

Yields

Std. Dev. Of the Mean

 

bu/A

 

T1

30.4a

0.91

T2

30.3a

0.91

T3

31.1a

0.94

T4

33.0a

1.00

T5

31.7a

0.94

Control

20.1b

0.91

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.




Table 13. Mean soybean yields of flat and hipped land preparation treatments for the 3-year study.

Treatment

Yield

Std. Dev. Of the Mean

 

bu/A

 

Flat

30.9

0.95

Hipped

28.5

1.01

Means not having a letter in common differ significantly at the 5% (P=0.05) level according to the Least Significance Difference Criterion.