Table 1. Kenaf tolerance to Bladex®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

ton/A

Bladex

0.8

0

38

0

4.8

Bladex

1.0

0

39

0

4.2

Bladex

1.6

0

37

0

4.1

Check

--

0

38

0

4.2

LSD 0.05a

 

NS

NS

NS

0.5

CV

 

 

 

 

12

Pr>F

 

 

 

 

0.0001

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 2. Kenaf tolerance to Blazer®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

ton/A

Blazer

0.38

0

35

23

5.4

Blazer

0.50

0

36

58

5.6

Blazer

0.75

0

35

65

5.5

Check

--

0

36

0

6.0

LSD 0.05a

 

NS

NS

26

NS

CV

 

 

 

36

 

Pr>F

 

 

 

0.002

 

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 3. Kenaf tolerance to Cobra®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

ton/A

Cobra

0.20

0

39

0

5.5

Cobra

0.25

0

40

0

5.4

Cobra

0.40

0

43

0

5.6

Check

--

0

42

0

4.8

LSD 0.05a

--

NS

3

NS

0.74

CV

 

 

7

 

13

PR>F

 

 

0.121

 

0.0001

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 4. Kenaf tolerance to Cotton Pro®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

1993

1994

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

---ton/A---

Cotton Pro

0.50

0

36

0

--

8.9

Cotton Pro

0.65

0

37

0

--

7.4

Cotton Pro

1.0

0

43

0

--

8.3

Check

--

0

36

0

--

6.4

LSD 0.05a

 

NS

NS

NS

--

NS

CV

 

 

 

 

--

 

PR>F

 

 

 

 

--

 

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 5. Kenaf tolerance to Direx®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

1993

1994

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

---ton/A---

Direx

0.59

16

33

0

4.0

6.3

Direx

0.79

22

33

0

3.0

6.7

Direx

1.20

21

33

0

3.6

6.1

Check

--

0

33

0

3.2

7.5

LSD 0.05a

 

6.4

NS

NS

NS

1.3

CV

 

56

 

 

 

10

PR>F

 

0.001

 

 

 

0.1531

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 6. Kenaf tolerance to Meturon®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

ton/A

Meturon

1.0

0

36

0

6.2

Meturon

1.3

0

34

0

5.4

Meturon

2.0

0

34

0

5.6

Check

--

0

36

0

6.1

LSD 0.05a

 

NS

NS

NS

NS

CV

 

 

 

 

 

Pr>F

 

 

 

 

 

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 7. Kenaf tolerance to Reflex®, applied postemergence-directed (POST-Dir) in 1993 and 1994, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS.

Treatment

Rate

Kenaf

Leaf
Injury

Height

Girdling

Yield

 

lb/A

%

inch

%

ton/A

Reflex

0.38

4

34

33

5.2

Reflex

0.50

9

33

50

4.5

Reflex

0.75

14

31

83

5.3

Check

--

0

35

0

5.4

LSD 0.05a

 

3

2

18

NS

CV

 

48

5

21

 

Pr>F

 

0.0001

0.008

0.0002

 

aFor all pairwise comparisons.


Table 8. Effects of Bueno6® applied over-the-top at 3 rates and growth stages in 1994.

Treatment

Rate
lb/A

Growth
stage

Leaf injury

Height

Yield

5-23

6-10

6-15

6-10

9-20

 

 

(in.)

 

(%)

 

(in.)

(ft.)

ton/A

Bueno-6

1

3

2

0

0

20

13.0

7.3

Bueno-6

2

3

7

0

0

18

12.9

6.1

Bueno-6

3

3

15

3

0

17

13.0

6.7

Bueno-6

1

12

2

0

0

19

12.7

7.1

Bueno-6

2

12

0

0

0

20

12.8

6.9

Bueno-6

3

12

5

12

0

19

12.7

6.8

Bueno-6

1

24

0

0

2

21

12.6

5.8

Bueno-6

2

24

0

0

22

22

12.4

6.4

Bueno-6

3

24

0

0

45

20

12.0

6.2

Untreated

--

--

0

0

0

21

13.2

7.4

LSD P=0.05a

 

 

7

3

2

2

0.6

NS

aFor all pairwise comparisons.