| Table 74. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Early Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides1 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction2,3 | Herbicide reaction7 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot4 |
Cyst nematode5 | Frogeye leafspot4 | Stem canker4,6 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
AP 4880 |
AgriPro |
M |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
A4341 |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
S |
R |
R |
1.1 |
T |
A4715 |
Asgrow |
-- |
M |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R-(VS) |
3.7 |
T |
DP3478 |
Deltapine |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK 4755 |
Hornbeck |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HY 4540 |
HyPerformer |
M |
-- |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R-VS |
2.9 |
T |
S46-44 |
NK |
-- |
-- |
S |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.1 |
T |
TV4479 |
Terral |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
R-(VS) |
4.6 |
T |
TV4664 |
Terral |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Stressland |
Public |
R |
-- |
S |
S |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
TN4-86 |
Public |
-- |
S |
S |
R |
R |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
| 1All are released varieties. 2R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I = Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 3The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 4Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 5Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 6"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 7Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 75. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Late Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
A4922 |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
R-(VS) |
4.1 |
T |
CX499c |
DEKALB |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
-- |
MS |
-- |
T |
Delta Grow 4710 |
Delta Grow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
DK4860 |
Delta King |
-- |
-- |
S |
S |
MS |
S |
S-VS |
4.4 |
-- |
Dixie 478 |
Dixie |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
S |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
DG3495 |
Dyna-Gro |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
-- |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK 49 |
Hornbeck |
-- |
R |
-- |
S |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK 5149 |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
S 48-14 |
NK |
-- |
-- |
R |
-- |
-- |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T |
S 51-00 |
NK |
S |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T |
9482 |
Pioneer |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.2 |
T |
9511 |
Pioneer |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
499 |
Riverside |
R |
R |
-- |
S |
S |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T-S |
TV 4770 |
Terral |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
MR |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
KS 4895 |
Public |
S |
-- |
S |
MS |
MS |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Manokin |
Public |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
MR |
R |
1.0 |
T |
TN4-86 |
Public |
-- |
S |
-- |
R |
R |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T |
TN4-94 |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
MR |
S |
(R)-S |
2.4 |
T |
Wicomico |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC750 |
DEKALB |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.1 |
T |
DGC751 |
DEKALB |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
VS |
4.6 |
T |
DK LDKX49994 |
Delta King |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
VS |
4.7 |
T |
DPX9749 |
Deltapine |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK X9748 |
Hornbeck |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
RVS 490 |
Riverside |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
TVX4975 |
Terral |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 76. Reaction of Maturity Group V Early Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
A5547 |
Asgrow |
M |
-- |
R |
MR |
R |
I |
R |
1.0 |
T |
CX 510C |
DEKALB |
M |
-- |
S |
MR |
MR |
S |
(R)-S |
1.5 |
T |
Delta Grow 5330 |
Delta Grow |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
T |
DP 3519s |
Deltapine |
M |
-- |
M |
MR |
MS |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Delta King 5475 |
Delta King |
S |
-- |
M |
R |
S |
R |
R-VS |
2.1 |
T |
H5050 |
Hartz |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
MS |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
H5218 |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
I |
(R)-MS |
1.8 |
T |
H5454 |
Hartz |
S |
-- |
S |
MS |
MS |
MS |
R-VS(S) |
3.1 |
T |
HY 574 |
HyPerformer |
R |
R |
R |
MR |
S |
MS |
(R)-MS |
1.7 |
T |
S57-11 |
NK |
R |
-- |
R |
R |
R |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
RVS 77 |
Riverside |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
-- |
R |
(R)-MS |
1.2 |
T |
RVS 5291 |
Riverside |
M |
-- |
R |
S |
MS |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
RVS 549 |
Riverside |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
MS |
(R)-S |
1.7 |
T |
Robin-5 |
Riverside |
R |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
MS |
S-VS |
4.5 |
T |
TV5495 |
Terral |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
TV 5770 |
Terral |
M |
-- |
R |
-- |
-- |
I |
(R)-VS |
2.0 |
T |
TV5797 |
Terral |
M |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
(R)-S |
1.2 |
T |
Delsoy 5500 |
Public |
M |
-- |
M |
MS |
MR |
MS |
(R)-MS |
1.2 |
T-S |
Hutcheson |
Public |
-- |
M |
-- |
S |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Pace |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
R |
MS |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Rhodes |
Public |
- |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
(R)-MS |
1.7 |
T |
TN5-95 |
Public |
M |
-- |
M |
R |
MR |
MS |
R |
1.1 |
T |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC753 |
DEKALB |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
(R)-VS |
1.4 |
T |
DK LDKX51496 |
Delta King |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
DK LDKX57722 |
Delta King |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
DPX 9752 |
Deltapine |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
(R)-S |
1.2 |
T |
J94-5 |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
R-(VS) |
4.8 |
T |
R93-171 |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
1.3 |
T |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 77. Reaction of Maturity Group V Late Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
A5843 |
Asgrow |
M |
-- |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
A5848 |
Asgrow |
M |
-- |
M |
MR |
R |
R |
R |
1.1 |
T |
A5944 |
Asgrow |
M |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
MR |
R |
1.1 |
T |
A5959 |
Asgrow |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
(R)-MS |
2.1 |
T |
55 |
Buckshot |
-- |
S |
S |
R |
MS |
MS |
(R)-VS |
1.8 |
T |
CX570c |
DEKALB |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Delta King 5850 |
Delta King |
-- |
S |
-- |
MR |
MR |
MR |
R-VS(S) |
4.1 |
T |
Delta King 5995 |
Delta King |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
(R)-VS |
1.4 |
T |
DP 3588 |
Deltapine |
R |
M |
R |
R |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
DG3576 |
Dyna-Gro |
R |
-- |
M |
MS |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HLA572 |
Hartz |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
S59-60 |
NK |
S |
M |
S |
R |
R |
MS |
MR-(VS) |
4.0 |
T |
9592 |
Pioneer |
-- |
M |
S |
MR |
S |
I |
(R)-VS |
1.5 |
T |
9594 |
Pioneer |
M |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R-VS(S) |
3.5 |
T |
TV5893 |
Terral |
M |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
TV5926 |
Terral |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
ACCOMAC |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
R |
R-VS(S) |
3.7 |
T |
UARK-5896 |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
R |
MS |
MS |
(R)-VS |
1.4 |
S |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC758 |
DEKALB |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
(R)-VS |
1.6 |
T |
DGC759 |
DEKALB |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
DK LDKX54589 |
Delta King |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK X9657A |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R |
1.1 |
T |
HBK X9659A |
Hornbeck |
M |
-- |
R |
MR |
MR |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
J94-7 |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
R-VS(S) |
3.6 |
T |
R92-1294 |
Public |
R |
-- |
R |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.2 |
T |
S92-1679 |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
VS |
4.9 |
I |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 78. Reaction of Maturity Group VI Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
A6297 |
Asgrow |
-- |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
R-VS(S) |
3.4 |
T |
A6711 |
Asgrow |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
R-VS |
2.6 |
T |
A6785 |
Asgrow |
-- |
R |
R |
S |
S |
R |
VS |
4.9 |
T |
A6961 |
Asgrow |
-- |
M |
S |
R |
R |
VS |
R-VS |
1.2 |
T |
BU66 |
Buckshot |
-- |
R |
R |
R |
S |
R |
R-VS(S |
3.4 |
T |
BU723 |
Buckshot |
-- |
R |
-- |
S |
S |
S |
R |
1.0 |
T |
DP 3640 |
Deltapine |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
MS |
R |
(R)-VS |
1.3 |
T |
DP 3681 |
Deltapine |
S |
-- |
M |
MS |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
H6191 |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
H6255 |
Hartz |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
S |
R |
R-VS(MS) |
3.3 |
T |
HBK67 |
Hornbeck |
M |
-- |
M |
R |
S |
R |
(R)-VS |
1.5 |
T |
HY663 |
HyPerformer |
M |
-- |
M |
S |
MS |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
S62-62 |
NK |
M |
-- |
R |
MS |
R |
MR |
R |
1.0 |
T |
S65-50 |
NK |
M |
-- |
-- |
MR |
S |
VS |
(R)-MS |
1.3 |
T |
9611 |
Pioneer |
S |
-- |
M |
MS |
S |
MR |
(R)-VS |
2.2 |
T |
9631 |
Pioneer |
R |
-- |
M |
S |
S |
R |
S-(VS) |
4.7 |
T |
9692 |
Pioneer |
-- |
M |
S |
MR |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
9761 |
Pioneer |
-- |
-- |
R |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
97b61 |
Pioneer |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
VS |
R-VS(S) |
3.9 |
T |
RVS678 |
Riverside |
R |
-- |
M |
S |
S |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
RVS699 |
Riverside |
-- |
M |
S |
MS |
MS |
R |
(R)-MS |
1.9 |
T |
BOGGS |
SGA |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
VS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Terra-Vig 6792 |
Terral |
-- |
R |
R |
R |
R |
VS |
R-VS(S) |
3.6 |
T |
Dillon |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
S |
S |
(R)-VS |
1.6 |
T |
Lamar |
Public |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
VS |
R |
1.0 |
I |
Musen |
Public |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.1 |
-- |
TN6-90 |
Public |
-- |
M |
S |
R |
R |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
Young |
Public |
-- |
M |
S |
S |
S |
R |
R-VS(S) |
3.2 |
T |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC762 |
DEKALB |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R-VS |
2.0 |
T |
HBK X9666 |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
HBK X9668 |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-VS(S) |
3.1 |
T |
R90-149s |
Public |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-(VS) |
4.3 |
T |
R92-1258 |
Public |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
VS |
R |
1.0 |
T |
R93-151 |
Public |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
SC89-147 |
Public |
R |
-- |
M |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
V88-494 |
Public |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 79. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Early Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
AG4501RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R-VS |
2.5 |
T |
AG4601RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
S-VS |
4.3 |
-- |
RT446RR |
MFA Morsoy |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-(VS) |
3.5 |
T |
TV4666RR |
Terral |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-S |
3.3 |
-- |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
SB-HBK X9746RR |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
MR |
1.2 |
-- |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 80. Reaction of Maturity Group IV Late Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
AG4701RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-VS |
3.7 |
-- |
AG4702RR |
Asgrow |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
H4994RR |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
R |
S-(VS) |
4.2 |
-- |
H4998RR |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
S-VS |
4.1 |
-- |
SF 477RR |
SF Services |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
T |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DK LDKX45478RR |
Delta King |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
VS |
4.9 |
-- |
UAPX 0063RR |
Dyna-Gro |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
X9753RR |
NK |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
T |
SB-HBK X9648RR |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 81. Reaction of Maturity Group V Early Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
AP543RR |
AgriPro |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
-- |
-- |
T |
AG5601RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
AG5602RR |
Asgrow |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
H5545RR |
Hartz |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R-VS |
2.3 |
-- |
H5351RR |
Hartz |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
(R)-S |
1.5 |
-- |
H5088RR |
Hartz |
R |
S |
-- |
R |
S |
R |
R |
1.1 |
S |
H5855RR |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R-VS |
2.4 |
-- |
RT541RR |
MFA Morsoy |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SG567RR |
Sure-Grow |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SF567RR |
SF Services |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
TV5666RR |
Terral |
M |
-- |
R |
R |
MR |
R |
(R)-MR |
1.4 |
-- |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC550RR |
DEKALB |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.1 |
-- |
DGC7530RR |
DEKALB |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
DGC7540RR |
DEKALB |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R-VS(S) |
4.1 |
-- |
DGC7550RR |
DEKALB |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
MR-VS(S) |
4.3 |
-- |
DK LDKX51155RR |
Delta King |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
DK LDKX58974RR |
Delta King |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
DP 5644 RR |
Deltapine |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
MS |
1.5 |
-- |
DP 5767 RR |
Deltapine |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SB-HBK X9654RR |
Hornbeck |
S |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SB-HBK X9754RR |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SB-HBK X9755RR |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
TVX 5466RR |
Terral |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R-(VS) |
4.4 |
-- |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||
| Table 82. Reaction of Maturity Group V Late Roundup Ready Soybeans to Pests and Herbicides | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Brand | Disease reaction1,2 | Herbicide reaction6 | |||||||
| Phytophthora root rot3 |
Cyst nematode4 | Frogeye leafspot3 | Stem canker3,5 | |||||||
| R2 | R7 | R10 | R3 | R14 | Rating | Score | ||||
| Released Varieties | ||||||||||
AP588RR |
AgriPro |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
AG5801RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-VS(S) |
3.4 |
-- |
AG5901RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
AG6101RR |
Asgrow |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.2 |
-- |
H5889RR |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
H5999RR |
Hartz |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.2 |
-- |
HX60001RR |
Hartz |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S59-V6RR |
NK |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R-VS(S) |
3.8 |
-- |
SG597RR |
Sure-Grow |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
SG617RR |
Sure-Grow |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MR |
R-VS |
2.4 |
-- |
| Experimental Lines | ||||||||||
DGC7580RR |
DEKALB |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MS |
R-VS(S) |
3.2 |
-- |
DK LDKX53234RR |
Delta King |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
R |
1.0 |
-- |
DP 5806 RR |
Deltapine |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
I |
MS |
1.5 |
-- |
DP 5960 RR |
Deltapine |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
R |
S |
3.0 |
-- |
SB-HBK X9758RR |
Hornbeck |
R |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-VS(S) |
3.2 |
-- |
TVX 5866RR |
Terral |
M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
S |
R-VS(S) |
2.9 |
-- |
|
1R = Resistant; M = Mixture (Resistant and Susceptible type reaction may be
segregating or seed mixture); MR = Moderately Resistant; MS = Moderately Susceptible; S = Susceptible; VS = Very Susceptible; I =
Intermediate (variation in response has been observed); and T = Tolerant. 2The hydroponic technique used in this trial measures major gene resistance. Some of the varieties that are rated susceptible may have a high degree of field tolerance to Phytophthora root rot. Some of the varieties in this test are known not to have a major gene for Phytophthora resistance, but were rated resistant. This is believed to be an expression "field tolerance," (due to the use of a low inoculum potential). 3Ratings as made by plant pathologists at Mississippi State University. 4Nematode reactions as reported by R.D. Riggs, Plant Pathologist, University of Arkansas. 5"Score" gives an average rating of 40 plants stuck with a toothpick of stem canker inoculum. "Rating" is a scale or level of tolerance based on the score of the plants toothpicked: VS = 4.6-5.0; S = 2.0-4.5; MS = 1.5-1.9; MR = 1.2-1.4; and R = 1.0-1.1. Some lines or varieties exhibited a range of reactions to stem canker. These findings are expressed as ranges in the table (i.e. R-VS). In these ranges, letters in parentheses highlight a variety's predominant reaction. For example, "(R)-VS" means the variety ranged from resistant to very susceptible in its response; however, the predominant response was resistant. Varieties or lines that exhibitied such a range were mixes or were still segregating. 6Reaction to 0.125 hydroponic screening to metribuzin. | ||||||||||