Table 18. Performance of 24 varieties in the Narrow-Row Cotton Variety Test, planted in 32-inch rows on a Dubbs sandy loam soil at Sumner, MS in 1994.*

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Lint    First    Lint     Boll     Micro-    Length    Unif.    Strength    Elong-                                                                     USDA Loan Basis***
Variety name        yield    pick   fraction    wt      naire     (UHM)     index    (HVI)       ation
                    lbs/A    --%--   --%--    --g--               -in.-     --%--    g/tex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suregrow 501         1722     100     40.1     5.07      4.75     1.16      84.8      31.2       7.1
Hartz H1220          1718     100     39.1     5.40      4.92     1.16      85.1      28.5       8.3
Chembred CB 232      1630     100     36.7     5.57      4.73     1.17      84.0      25.8       7.2
DP/SG DES119         1618     100     38.0     5.11      4.62     1.18      84.6      31.4       7.7
Suregrow 125         1611     100     39.1     5.14      4.74     1.17      83.9      28.8       7.8
Deltapine 50         1592     100     35.8     5.35      4.09     1.19      82.3      25.4       7.5
Chembred CB 1233     1576     100     38.3     5.07      4.36     1.16      83.8      29.9       6.8
Deltapine DP 5409    1573     100     38.7     4.55      4.56     1.14      82.5      28.9       7.5
Deltapine DP 5415    1554     100     40.6     4.83      4.84     1.15      83.3      31.3       7.6
Hartz H1215          1552     100     38.9     4.99      4.84     1.18      85.2      31.6       7.8
Chembred CB 333      1536     100     37.4     5.57      4.53     1.13      83.5      28.1       7.3
Hartz H1244          1507     100     38.6     5.24      4.62     1.15      84.3      30.8       8.2
Suregrow 404         1494     100     37.9     4.80      4.93     1.13      84.0      31.7       7.2
Deltapine 20         1469     100     36.7     5.05      4.04     1.16      83.5      25.5       7.8
Hartz H1330          1463     100     37.6     5.34      4.63     1.18      84.7      28.1       6.9
Hartz Hx 91-17       1457     100     37.9     5.87      4.81     1.15      84.4      31.3       6.4
Deltapine 51         1455     100     38.2     5.02      4.73     1.15      84.0      24.9       7.0
Germain's GC 9229    1447     100     38.1     4.96      3.91     1.17      86.0      30.5       7.0
Hartz H1380          1446     100     39.0     5.05      4.40     1.14      83.8      25.8       7.7
Chembred CB 830      1440     100     34.5     6.57      5.09     1.11      84.6      28.1       7.1
Hyperformer HS 46    1429     100     39.9     4.86      4.42     1.15      83.2      35.1       7.2
Hyperformer HY 39    1421     100     36.1     4.72      4.57     1.18      84.7      33.8       6.3
Hyperformer HS44     1413     100     39.0     5.28      4.93     1.14      83.7      31.3       6.7
Hartz Hx 1560        1304     100     38.4     5.25      4.45     1.15      83.7      29.7       7.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRAND MEAN           1517     100     38.1     5.19      4.60     1.15      84.0      29.4       7.3
LSD (0.05)            119      --     1.80     0.49      0.39     0.02       NS        2.6       0.6
CV (%)               8.20      --     2.68     5.55      5.00     1.02      1.10       5.09      4.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Planted on April 20.  Harvested on October 28.

*  Lint yield and first pick data from 6 replications;  fiber, boll and seed data from hand-harvested
   100-boll samples taken from 2 replications;  values in bold type are not statistically different
   from the highest yielding variety

NOTE: Test was affected by irregular thrips damage early in the season; 6 plots (out of 144 in the test)
      were discarded and 8 were trimmed to remove severly affected areas.  Resulting data could
      be affected by subjective assessment of thrips damage and action taken.