Food
Quality and Protection Act
The
Food Quality Protection Act or FQPA, became law in
August 1996. The main focus of FQPA is to protect
the public from pesticide residues in dietary and
nondietary sources.
Some
provisions of FQPA include:
A
single health-based safety standard for pesticide
residue tolerances in both raw and processed food;
An
explicit determination that residue tolerances are
safe for children;
Consideration
of (1) Aggregate exposure to residues of pesticides
(including food, drinking water, and residential
use) and (2) Exposure to all other pesticides with
a common mechanism of toxicity, when setting
residue tolerances; and
EPA
review of all existing residue tolerances within 10
years.
FQPA
has profoundly changed the way pesticide tolerances
are determined. Prior to FQPA, each pesticide was
examined individually when setting a residue
tolerance. Now EPA must consider the cumulative
effects of all pesticides with a common mechanism
of toxicity, i.e., pesticides that act in the
same manner on human health. For example, since all
organophosphate (OP) insecticides (e.g.,
chlorpyrifos, malathion, diazinon) have a common
mechanism of toxicity, the cumulative effects of
all of them must be considered when setting a
residue tolerance for one of them.
EPA
must combine (aggregate) the risks of dietary
exposure resulting from the pesticide's use on food
crops with the risks of residues that might be
found in drinking water and residential use.
What
does this all mean? EPA uses the risk
cup to describe how tolerances will be set
under FQPA. A full cup represents the amount of
pesticide that a person could receive every day for
70 years without significant health risk. This is
determined through animal studies where a
non-effect exposure amount for the pesticide is
identified. This amount is reduced by a 100- to
1,000-fold factor to determine the daily/lifetime
safe exposure for humans.
What
does FQPA do to the RISK CUP?
BEFORE
FQPA: When setting a residue tolerance, EPA
considered only exposure to pesticides in
food.--THE RISK CUP CONTAINED ONLY DIETARY
EXPOSURE.
NOW:
EPA must consider exposure through ALL POSSIBLE
SOURCES.--the CUP CONTAINS BOTH DIETARY
AND NONDIETARY EXPOSURE.
RESULT:
Cup fills more quickly; less room for new and
existing uses.
BEFORE
FQPA: When establishing a residue tolerance,
EPA considered each pesticide separately/--THERE
WAS ONE RISK CUP FOR EACH PESTICIDE.
NOW:
FQPA must consider compounds with a common
mechanism of toxicity--EACH CUP, CONTAINS A GROUP
OF PESTICIDES THAT WORK THE SAME WAY.
RESULT:
CUP FILLS QUICKLY; LESS ROOM FOR THE PESTICIDES AND
THEIR USES.
BEFORE
FQPA: When setting a residue tolerance, EPA
added safety factors to account for animal testing
and human variability. One hundred to 1,000-fold
safety margin.
NOW:
EPA must consider infants and children. An
additional 10-fold safety factor may be added to
protect kids. One thousand to 10,000-fold safety
margin.
RESULT:
CUP GETS SMALLER; LESS ROOM FOR PESTICIDES AND
THEIR USES.
WHAT
HAPPENS WHEN THE CUP IS FULL OR A MANUFACTURER
WANTS TO ADD A NEW USE OR PRODUCT?
The
pesticide manufacturer could:
1.
Make label or formulation changes so the
pesticide is safer. This means the pesticide
and/or its uses require less room in the cup.
2.
Drop pesticides and/or uses from the cup.
This would make more room for the remaining uses or
for possible new uses.
All
pesticide tolerances must be reviewed by EPA by
2,006, but the deadline for reviewing
organophosphate and carbamate (e.g. methomyl,
aldicarb, Sevin, etc.) food-use tolerances is
August 1999. Minor crops like fruits and vegetables
are most at risk for label restrictions and loss of
product registrations. If you grow such crops, be
aware that your pesticide options may change over
the next few years.
WHAT
CAN YOU DO?
Be
informed about FQPA and its impacts on pesticide
use.
Determine
what pesticides are important to you in producing
the crops you grow. Communicate these needs to the
MSU Extension Service, commodity groups, USDA and
EPA
Respond
to university, USDA-NASS or commodity-sponsored
pesticide-use surveys. This information is needed
to make informed decisions about pesticide
registrations, new uses and tolerances. See below
for crops/pesticides of concern.
EPA's
Priority Crops for Pesticide Use Data (based on
importance in diets of children)
- apples
- oranges
- peaches
- soybean*
- pears
- carrots
- rice*
- beef
- coconut
oil
- corn*
- potatoes*
(sweet)
- bananas
- wheat*
- sugarcane
- green
beans
- oats
- eggs
- tomatoes
- peas
- chicken
*crop
profiles being developed in MS
Pesticides
of Concern under FQPA Organophosphates
acephate
azinphosmethyl
bensulide
chlorethoxyfos
chlorpyrifos
coumaphos
DEF
diazinon
dichlorvos
dicrotophos
dimethoate
disulfoton
ethion
ethoprop
ethyl parathion
fenamiphos
fenitrothion
fenthion
fonofos
isofenphos
malathion
methamidophos
methidation
methyl parathion
naled
oxydemeton methyl
phorate
phosmet
phostebupirim
pirimiphos methyl
profenofos
propetamphos
sulfotepp
sulprofos
temephos
terbufos
tetrachlorvinphos
trichlorfon
Carbamates
2EEBC-F
formetanate
aldicarb
asulam
bendiocarb
benomyl
carabaryl
carbendazim
carbofuran
chlorpropham
desmidipham
fenoxycarb
formetanate
methiocarb
methomyl
oxamyl
phenmedipham
propamocarb hydrochloride
propoxur
thiodicarb
thiophanate methyl
troysan KK
Potential
Carcinogens (B1's and B2's)
acetochlor
acflourfen sodium
alachlor
amitrol
cacodylic acid
captan
chlorothalonil
creosote
cyproconazole
daminozide
ETO
fenoxycarb
folpet
formaldehyde
heptachlor
iprodione
lactofen
lindane
mancozeb
maneb
metam sodium
metiram
MGK
oxythioquinox
pentachlorophenol
pronamide
propargite
propoxur
propylene oxide
telone
terrazole
thiodicarb
TPTH
vinclozolin
|